Fruit & Vegetable Ingredients in Pet Food: Where They Fit (Fiber, Palatability, Label)

Why fruits and vegetables are used in pet food

In pet food formulation, fruit and vegetable ingredients typically serve one or more of these roles: fiber and stool quality support, texture and moisture management, palatability and aroma, and label positioning. Some ingredients, like pumpkin or sweet potato purees, are strongly associated with digestive support narratives and are common in sensitive-stomach products. Fruit concentrates can support palatability in gravies and coatings by adding sweetness perception and aroma complexity. In premium positioning, “fruit and veg” inclusions can also help create a “whole-food” identity, even when used at modest inclusion rates. The key is to match the ingredient to a functional target, not to add fruit “just because.”

Common formats and where each makes sense

Pet food manufacturers may use fruit and vegetable ingredients in several industrial formats: concentrates (high solids, efficient shipping, useful for gravies and coatings), aseptic purees (body, texture, and “real ingredient” appearance), NFC juices (aroma and freshness notes, typically in limited, controlled use cases), and sometimes dry forms created downstream (powders or inclusions). In many pet food applications, concentrates and aseptic purees are preferred over NFC because they offer more predictable stability and handling. Format choice is driven by how the ingredient is introduced into the process: in a wet mixing stage, as a coating, or as a post-process inclusion.

For a general format-selection framework (concentrate vs puree vs NFC), see Topic 001. While written for beverages, the yield/cost and handling logic applies across industries.

Functional role 1: fiber, stool quality, and digestive support positioning

Fiber is one of the most common reasons vegetables appear in pet food. Ingredients like pumpkin and sweet potato are often used to support stool quality narratives. In practice, the performance depends on the specific fiber profile, inclusion rate, and how the ingredient behaves through processing. For dry kibble, fiber sources must survive extrusion without creating unacceptable texture changes. For wet foods, fiber-containing purees can change viscosity and water binding in gravies and loaf formats. Formulators should validate both palatability and stool outcomes under realistic feeding conditions, and ensure claims remain compliant with pet food labeling norms.

For a deep dive on pumpkin and sweet potato in pet food, see Topic 079.

Functional role 2: palatability, aroma, and “treat-like” appeal

Palatability is a major driver in both dog and cat foods. Fruit systems can contribute a mild sweetness perception, aroma complexity, and a “treat-like” profile, especially in sauces, gravies, and coatings. Apple and berry profiles can add a soft, sweet aroma that complements meat-based flavors, while vegetable notes can contribute freshness cues in certain “garden blend” concepts. The goal is not to make the product taste fruity to humans; it is to shape aroma and mouthfeel in a way that supports acceptance. Palatability decisions should be validated through species-appropriate testing, because cat and dog preferences differ.

For gravies and sauce-style pet food applications, see Topic 083.

Functional role 3: texture, moisture management, and processing behavior

Purees can act as texture builders in wet products and certain treats. They contribute solids, water-binding behavior, and viscosity—affecting how a gravy pours, how a loaf sets, or how a gel treat holds shape. In dry kibble, fruit/veg ingredients can also change dough behavior during extrusion, affecting expansion and final texture. Because pet food is often produced under high shear and high temperature, process compatibility is essential. Evaluate how your ingredient behaves in the actual process (extrusion or retort), not only in a benchtop slurry.

For extrusion and coating specifics in kibble, see Topic 080.

Wet vs dry: different processes, different constraints

Pet food is split into major manufacturing families: dry kibble (typically extruded), wet/canned foods (often retorted), and treats (many formats). Each family imposes different constraints on fruit and vegetable ingredients. Extrusion can reduce delicate aroma and shift color; it can also create burn/caramel notes if sugars are high. Retort can change color and texture and may intensify cooked notes. Treat systems vary widely: soft chews and gels can benefit from purees for texture, while crunchy treats may prefer concentrates or dry forms. Ingredient selection should begin with the process: choose formats that survive the process without causing manufacturing issues.

Label and claims: keep “human expectations” separate from pet-label reality

Many brands use fruits and vegetables to support premium positioning and “whole food” narratives. But claims must still align with pet food labeling norms and regulatory expectations in the target market. Overstating health benefits can create risk. The safer approach is to focus on ingredient transparency (“with pumpkin,” “with apple”) and functional positioning that is supported by formulation logic and feeding outcomes. Procurement and regulatory teams should align early on what claims are acceptable for the brand and market.

For a practical documentation and claims checklist in pet food, see Topic 081.

Micro, storage, and plant handling: treat fruit/veg like a real risk variable

Even though fruit and vegetable ingredients may be “low risk” compared with animal proteins, they still require a defined micro and storage posture. Aseptic purees are popular because they simplify handling and reduce cold-chain dependence, but they still require correct receiving, storage, and connection practices to avoid contamination. In plants, poor handling can introduce spoilage organisms into wet mixes, causing costly batch losses. The best practice is to define incoming micro expectations, verify COA and lot coding, and design HACCP-friendly handling procedures.

For storage and shelf-life considerations in pet food plants, see Topic 084.

Procurement documentation: what buyers typically need

Pet food buyers commonly request a documentation set similar to other industrial categories: COA, allergen statement, country of origin, traceability, and any certifications required (organic, etc. when applicable). If the ingredient will be used in a high-visibility product line, buyers may also request a supplier questionnaire, change control policy, and packaging specifications. Documentation discipline reduces interruptions during audits and helps keep production schedules predictable.

For the pet-food-specific documentation guide, see Topic 081. For broader COA fundamentals, see Topic 093.

Next steps

If you share your pet food format (kibble, wet, topper, treat), target inclusion (fruit/veg type and purpose), processing method (extrusion, retort, baking), desired packaging format (drum/tote/bag-in-box), destination market, and documentation needs, PFVN can recommend the best fruit/vegetable ingredient formats and specification controls for consistent production performance. Use Request a Quote or visit Contact. You can also browse Products and Bulk Juice Concentrates.

Continue reading: Topic 078 — Pet Treat Gels & Soft Chews • Back to Academy index

Previous article: Topic 076 — High-Acid Concentrates in Preblends
Academy index: All 100 industrial application guides
Next article: Topic 078 — Pet Treat Gels & Soft Chews